Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BAR ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CLEVELAND v. SANDERS.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — One-year suspension — Conversion of funds.

Per Curiam.

After a thorough examination of the record, we concur with the findings of the board. It is important to note that the board found that respondent "* * * cooperated fully with Relator and its counsel in marshalling the facts with respect to the events that gave rise to these proceedings and displayed professional candor in attempting to have this matter fully and fairly resolved." The board also found that respondent "* * * clearly demonstrated his remorse for his prior conduct and clearly established sincere intentions on his part to avoid any such behavior in the future." In light of these findings, we concur with the recommendation of the board and not the relator with regard to sanctions.

It is, therefore, the judgment of this court that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio for a period of one year.

Judgment accordingly.

CELEBREZZE, C.J., SWEENEY, LOCHER, HOLMES, C. BROWN, DOUGLAS and WRIGHT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BAR ASSN. OF GREATER CLEVELAND v. SANDERS
(May 14, 1986)