AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

CARL J. FRYS, Appellant-Respondent, v. KAREN R. FRYS, Respondent-Appellant.

Order unanimously modified, on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: It was error for Matrimonial Special Term to award maintenance to defendant pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (9) (b). The provisions of that paragraph expressly do not apply to a separation agreement made, as here, prior to the effective date of the Equitable Distribution Law (EDL) (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B], eff July 19, 1980). Such an agreement is governed by pre-EDL statutory provisions and decisional law (De Jose v De Jose, 66 N.Y.2d 804; Strader v Strader, 91 A.D.2d 852). Thus an award of support may be made to defendant wife upon a showing "that she is actually unable to support herself on the amount heretofore allowed and is in actual danger of becoming a public charge" (McMains v McMains, 15 N.Y.2d 283, 285). We reject defendant's claim that the proof in this record satisfies that standard. The maintenance award must be vacated.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRYS v. FRYS
(May 23, 1986)