AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARDINE WAITERS, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant was convicted of reckless manslaughter for stabbing the deceased in the heart with a kitchen knife. She called the police to the scene and, without being questioned, told the officers that the victim had been hitting her and that she had stabbed him in self-defense. When one of the officers asked her where the knife was, she pointed to it on a table. The officer's inquiry and his seizure of the knife were justifiable for safety reasons and did not violate the defendant's constitutional right against self-incrimination (see, New York v Quarles, 467 U.S. 649). Furthermore, her initial statements were spontaneous and entirely voluntary. The defendant's subsequent videotaped confession was made after she was fully informed of her rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona ( 384 U.S. 436) and knowingly and intelligently waived them. The verdict was based on a reasonable view of the evidence.

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions, including the argument that her sentence was excessive, and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WAITERS
(Jun 2, 1986)