AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. NATHAN NICKENS, Appellant.

A police officer using binoculars observed defendant delivering glassine envelopes containing a white powdery substance to two persons in exchange for money. Defendant secreted a number of such envelopes, held together with a rubber band, behind the phone in a nearby telephone booth. After arresting defendant, the backup officer found 10 glassine envelopes containing cocaine inside a small circular hole near the top of the phone booth.

This evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16), i.e., possession with intent to sell.

However, the court erred in not dismissing the count charging criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03). As the District Attorney properly concedes, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree is an inclusory concurrent count (CPL 300.30) of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, of which defendant was also convicted. As such, the inclusory count should have been dismissed (CPL 300.40 [b]; People v. Williams, 67 A.D.2d 265, affd 50 N.Y.2d 996; People v Gaul, 63 A.D.2d 563). Accordingly, the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree should be reversed, and the one-year sentence vacated.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Asch, Fein, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. NICKENS
(Jun 5, 1986)