AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CAMERON CINTRON, Appellant.

Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by providing that the sentences imposed shall run concurrently. As so modified, judgment affirmed.

A review of the record clearly shows that the police seizure of the defendant and the prompt showup that followed did not violate his rights. Although there were two distinct crimes committed, we find that under the circumstances the sentences imposed should run concurrently. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CINTRON
(Jul 21, 1986)