Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. STINSON.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Indefinite suspension — Neglect of legal matter — Excessive fee — Acts of dishonesty and creating false evidence.

Per Curiam.

Based upon review of the evidence presented to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, the court concurs in the findings and recommendations of the board. Therefore, it is the judgment of the court that respondent, Edward H. Stinson, be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs of the proceeding are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

CELEBREZZE, C.J., SWEENEY, LOCHER, HOLMES, C. BROWN, DOUGLAS and WRIGHT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. STINSON
(Jul 23, 1986)