Judgments affirmed.
By pleading guilty prior to the determination of his suppression motion, the defendant waived appellate review of all issues raised therein (see, People v Fernandez, 67 N.Y.2d 686; People v Prescott, 66 N.Y.2d 216, 219-220, cert denied ___ US ___, 106 S Ct 1804; People v Bell, 110 A.D.2d 902; People v Querica, 106 A.D.2d 589; People v Corti, 88 A.D.2d 345). The challenge to the pleas has not been preserved by a motion to withdraw them or a motion to vacate the judgments (see, e.g., People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 N.Y.2d 997; People v Querica, supra). Moreover, since the plea allocutions complied with the basic requirements of People v Harris ( 61 N.Y.2d 9), nothing in the present record persuades us that vacatur of the pleas is warranted in the interest of justice. Inasmuch as there has been no abuse of discretion and neither a failure to observe sentencing principles nor a need to substitute our discretion for that of the sentencing court, the defendant's objection to the sentences imposed is without merit (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Weinstein, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.