AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS VALDELAMAR, Appellant.

Sentences imposed under indictments Nos. 1058/82 and 1136/82 affirmed. No opinion.

Sentences imposed under indictments Nos. 1293/82 and 3131/82 modified, on the law, by vacating the mandatory penalty assessments imposed. As so modified, sentences affirmed.

Because the crimes for which the defendant was convicted under indictments Nos. 1293/82 and 3131/82 were committed prior to the effective date of the mandatory penalty assessment statute (see, Penal Law § 60.35, as added by L 1982, ch 55, §§ 81, 96), the imposition of such assessments constituted an unconstitutional ex post facto penalty (see, People v Clarke, 111 A.D.2d 11; People v Santos, 105 A.D.2d 1135, 1136; People v Dodson, 96 A.D.2d 1116, 1118). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. VALDELAMAR
(Jul 28, 1986)