Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

COOLEY et al, Respondents, v. POWERS et ux, Appellants.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Defendants appeal from judgments ordering specific performance of a land sale contract, entering judgment for the unpaid balance, ordering a sheriff's sale without right of redemption if the judgment is not paid and specifying that plaintiffs could execute on any deficiency.

Our review of the record convinces us that the remedy of specific performance is not so harsh or oppressive in this case that it should be denied. Renard v. Allen, 237 Or. 406, 418, 391 P.2d 777 (1964). No statutory right of redemption exists following foreclosure of an equitable vendor's lien even though the vendor may obtain a deficiency judgment. Emco Investment, Inc. v. Vaden, 60 Or. App. 762, 655 P.2d 220 (1982).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COOLEY v. POWERS
(Aug 6, 1986)