Judgment affirmed.
The defendant contends for the first time on this appeal that the trial court's charge contained certain errors. As no objection to the charge was advanced at trial, any errors of law with respect to the charge were not preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05; see, People v Carrasquillo, 107 A.D.2d 817), and we see no basis for addressing the issue in the interest of justice. Mollen, P.J., Weinstein, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.