Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FAIRWAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANNOCK COUNTY, Idaho, Lyle Leslie, Bannock county Assessor; Vi

HUNTLEY, Justice.

Fairway Development Company has filed this I.A.R. 12 certified appeal from the trial court's order denying Fairway Development Company's motion for partial summary judgment. After reviewing the briefs, and having heard oral argument, the Court is of the opinion that the appeal would not materially advance the processing of this litigation and, since the order is otherwise non-appealable, the Court concludes that the Rule 12 certification was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. See Pichon v. L.J. Broekemeier, Inc., 99 Idaho 598, 600, 586 P.2d 1042, 1044 (1978).

Costs to appellant.

DONALDSON, C.J., and SHEPARD, BAKES and BISTLINE JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FAIRWAY DEVELOPMENT CO. v. BANNOCK COUNTY
(Sep 16, 1986)