Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JEAN S. TATUM v. FRANK TATUM

Rules of Civil Procedure 50.4 — motion for judgment n.o.v. — failure to preserve right Plaintiff failed to preserve her right to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict where she failed to move for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff assigns as error the denial by the trial judge of her motion to set aside the verdict of the jury on the issue of contributory negligence. This motion was in effect a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict pursuant to Rule 50(b)(1) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff failed to move for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. Therefore, plaintiff failed to preserve her right to move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Graves v. Walston, 302 N.C. 332, 275 S.E.2d 485 (1981).

Modified and affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TATUM v. TATUM
(Oct 1, 1986)