Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and writ of habeas corpus dismissed. Memorandum: There is no merit to relator's claim that he was deprived of the right to counsel at his preliminary parole revocation hearing (People ex rel. Clanton v Smith, 105 A.D.2d 1123, lv denied 64 N.Y.2d 606; see also, Executive Law § 259-i [c] [iii], [v]; 9 NYCRR 8005.5 [b]; People ex rel. Calloway v Skinner, 33 N.Y.2d 23, 31). Relator's remaining claim, that he was not given timely notice of the parole violation charges against him (see, Executive Law § 259-i [c] [iii]), is not supported by the record.