AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WAYNE HARRISON, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The claims of error based on the prosecutor's comments during summation were largely unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v Arce, 42 N.Y.2d 179, 190; People v Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 953), and those errors that were preserved did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 399; People v Jalah, 107 A.D.2d 762). Furthermore, there is no reason to disturb the defendant's sentences (see, People v Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305; People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 86). Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HARRISON
(Oct 20, 1986)