Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. JOSEPH BRONSTON, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

As found by the majority at the Appellate Division, Officer Sheffler, in responding at 4:30 A.M. to a 911 report of a burglary in progress at 155th Street and 8th Avenue, in Manhattan, ordered defendant down from a fire escape at gunpoint, put him against the wall, and frisked him without first inquiring about his reasons for being there. The majority properly held that this conduct was unjustified. We agree with the dissent, however, that the nature and location of the area where a suspect is detained may be one of the factors considered in determining whether, in a given case, the police acted reasonably (see, People v De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 220; People v Oden, 36 N.Y.2d 382, 385). Nevertheless, this factor, if considered here together with the circumstance that defendant's clothing and his presence on the fire escape were consistent with information transmitted in the report, would not warrant the degree of intrusion employed.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BRONSTON
(Oct 16, 1986)