FORTEC CONSTRUCTORS v. UNITED STATES

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Appeal No. 86-960.

Attorney(S)

Joseph T. Casey, Jr., Commercial Litigation Branch,
of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for
With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard,
, David M. Cohen, Director
Thomas W. Petersen,
James R. Thornton, Jr.,
of the Army, Savannah, Georgia, of
David W. Mockbee, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie Sims, Jackson,
, argued for

Judges

Helen Wilson Nies

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Appeal No. 86-960.

Attorney(S)

Joseph T. Casey, Jr., Commercial Litigation Branch,
of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for
With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard,
, David M. Cohen, Director
Thomas W. Petersen,
James R. Thornton, Jr.,
of the Army, Savannah, Georgia, of
David W. Mockbee, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie Sims, Jackson,
, argued for

Judges

Helen Wilson Nies

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

FORTEC CONSTRUCTORS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES, v. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANT.

NIES, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from the final judgment of the United States Claims Court, reported at 8 Cl.Ct. 490 (1985), awarding Fortec Constructors delay damages, an extension of contract time, interest, and costs. We affirm.

OPINION

Upon consideration of each of the government's arguments, we conclude that the government has failed to establish any error in the court's analysis. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Judge Yock's opinion.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

FORTEC CONSTRUCTORS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES, v. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANT.

Comments