AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CINCINNATI MILACRON, LTD., APPELLANT v. M/V AMERICAN LEGEND, HER ENGINES, BOILERS, ETC., AND UNITED STATES LINES, INC., APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

On rehearing of this appeal en banc, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for reasons stated in the dissent to the superseded panel decision. See Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd. v. M/V American Legend, 784 F.2d 1161, 1166 (4th Cir. 1986) (dissenting opinion).

Chief Judge Winter and Judge Ervin dissent and would reverse for reasons stated in the superseded opinion for the panel majority. See id. at 1162.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CINCINNATI MILACRON v. M/V AMERICAN LEGEND
(Nov 6, 1986)