Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's arguments that he was too intoxicated to form the requisite intent, and that he did not perform a voluntary act, were presented to and rejected by the trier of fact. Ample evidence supported the verdict of guilt (see, People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932; People v Watson, 111 A.D.2d 419).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions, including those advanced in his pro se supplemental brief, and have found them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.