Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. CAPERAHIM KHAN, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant's request for a justification charge, though made after summations and the court's initial charge, neither of which referred to that defense, was timely (CPL 300.10). The court's denial of the request was improper even though the act upon which the defense is based was not intentional (see, People v McManus, 67 N.Y.2d 541; People v Padgett, 60 N.Y.2d 142; People v Huntley, 87 A.D.2d 488, affd 59 N.Y.2d 868).

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur; Judge SIMONS taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. KHAN
(Nov 11, 1986)