Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OCTAVIO PECK, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that his statement made to police officers at the scene of a robbery should have been excluded from evidence because the People failed to provide him with timely notice or demonstrate good cause for such failure (CPL 710.30). To the extent that defendant's present contention was preserved for our review, it was waived (CPL 710.30). Defendant's additional argument that his trial attorney was so inadequate as to deny him effective assistance of counsel is without merit.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. PECK
(Nov 11, 1986)