Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the testimony of an eyewitness to the crime was not credible and that therefore his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We reject this contention. Credibility is a matter to be determined by the trier of the facts (People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, 757, cert denied 469 U.S. 932; People v Parks, 41 N.Y.2d 36, 47). Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the evidence adduced at the trial was sufficient in quantity and quality to support the verdict (see, People v Malizia, supra; cf. People v Restrepo, 93 A.D.2d 825; People v Fillion, 66 A.D.2d 932).
We reject the defendant's contention that two instances of prosecutorial misconduct during the summation denied him a fair trial (see, People v Boute, 111 A.D.2d 398). Mangano, J.P., Weinstein, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.