Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL D. VITOSH, APPELLANT, v. CLARA M. VITOSH, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Michael D. Vitosh appeals a judgment of the district court for Gage County authorizing his former wife, Clara, to remove their daughter from the state and denying his application for a reduction in child support.

We have reviewed the record de novo, as we are required, to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. See, Maack v. Maack, 223 Neb. 342, 389 N.W.2d 318 (1986); Meyers v. Meyers, 222 Neb. 370, 383 N.W.2d 784 (1986). Our review leads us to the conclusion that the district court did not abuse its discretion, and therefore the judgment entered by the district court should be affirmed.

The judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VITOSH v. VITOSH
(Dec 5, 1986)