AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THERESA MARTIN, Respondent, v. MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the plaintiff's motion is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

In Dolan v. Garden City Union Free School Dist. ( 113 A.D.2d 781, 784-785), this court set forth the two requirements which must be satisfied in order for a plaintiff to be entitled to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint. Firstly, the plaintiff's motion papers must demonstrate the merits of the case, the reasons for the delay and the fact that the increase is warranted by reason of facts which had recently come to the plaintiff's attention (see also, London v. Moore, 32 A.D.2d 543). Secondly, the motion papers must include a physician's affidavit or affirmation establishing a "causal connection between the injury and a consistent course of treatment for the accident-caused injuries" (Dolan v. Garden City Union Free School Dist., supra, at p 785). The plaintiff has failed to offer any reason for her delay of approximately five years before seeking the instant relief. Moreover, it does not appear that the requested increase was warranted by reason of facts which had recently come to the plaintiff's attention. In fact, the record indicates that the full extent of the plaintiff's injuries was diagnosed by her physician following surgery in 1980.

In view of the foregoing, we conclude that the Supreme Court, Kings County, abused its discretion in granting the motion to increase the ad damnum clause and to remove the action to the Supreme Court, Kings County. Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARTIN v. MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER
(Dec 15, 1986)