Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WOODS.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Indefinite suspension — Convictions for theft, forgery and uttering.

Per Curiam.

Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that respondent was convicted of theft, forgery and uttering in violation of R.C. 2913.02 and 2913.31. Under Gov. Bar R. V(9)(b), a certified copy of the judgment entry of conviction is conclusive evidence of the commission of these offenses. This court accordingly concurs with the board's finding that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6). Wherefore, this court accepts the recommendation of the board and hereby orders that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio. Costs shall be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

CELEBREZZE, C.J., SWEENEY, LOCHER, HOLMES, C. BROWN, DOUGLAS and WRIGHT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WOODS
(Dec 24, 1986)