Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN DOE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his sentences entered upon a guilty plea, contending that the trial court failed to exercise its independent sentencing discretion under section 893.135(3), Florida Statutes (1983). We agree. The trial judge labored under the mistaken impression that he was not free to reduce defendant's sentence beyond that recommended by the state under the terms of defendant's Pre-plea Agreement. The trial court imposed the five-year mandatory minimum sentence, erroneously believing that the statute prohibited further reduction; however, the trial court had the discretion to reduce the sentence further and was not bound by the state's recommendations. Quinones v. State, 448 So.2d 608 (Fla.3d DCA 1984); see State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514 (Fla. 1981); Cherry v. State, 439 So.2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We therefore remand the cause to the trial court for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOE v. STATE
(Jan 15, 1987)