Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROLAND E. REYNOLDS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HAROLD S. MYERS ET AL., APPELLEES.

Appeal and Error. Where the appellants' brief does not contain specific assignments of error as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1919 (Reissue 1985) and Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(1)d (rev. 1986), the judgment will be affirmed in the absence of any plain error this court may note.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants' brief in this case, which was filed on September 30, 1985, contained no specific assignments of error as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1919 (Reissue 1985) and Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 9D(1)d (rev. 1986). In this circumstance the judgment will be affirmed in the absence of any plain error this court may note. In re Interest of P.W., ante p. 197, 397 N.W.2d 36 (1986).

We note no plain error. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

CAPORALE, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REYNOLDS v. MYERS
(Jan 16, 1987)