AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WAYNE D. ROSEMOND, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We have reviewed all the issues presented on appeal and find them to be without merit. Among the issues raised, defendant contends that the prosecutor made prejudicial remarks during his summation. As there was no objection made by defense counsel during the summation, the alleged prejudicial statements were not preserved for appellate review (People v. Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641). In any event, the remarks were not a part of a pervasive pattern of misconduct, and defendant was not thereby deprived of his right to a fair trial (People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Demming, 116 A.D.2d 886).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ROSEMOND
(Jan 23, 1987)