Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PAUL RUFUS COMEAUX, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, COLACO ENGINEERS, INC., AMCA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ERRONEOUSLY DESIGNATED AS CLYDE IRONWORKS, BEAVER ADVANCE, INC., RWR DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LTD., CONCRETE STEEL ERECTORS, INC. SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

KNOLL, Judge.

For the foregoing reasons stated in the companion case of Bowman, et al. v. Weill Construction Company, et al., 502 So.2d 133 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1987), in which a separate decision is being rendered by us this day, we affirm the trial court's judgment sustaining Beaver's exceptions of insufficiency of citation and service of process. However, we reverse the trial court's judgment sustaining Beaver's exception of lack of personal jurisdiction and its dismissal of plaintiffs' suit against Beaver. We remand this case to the trial court to enter an order allowing plaintiffs a delay within which to supplement the record with proof of citation and service of process according to the Long Arm Statute further, right is reserved to Beaver to reurge its exception to jurisdiction, supported by proper proof if it elects to do so. The trial court's judgment dismissing AMCA from plaintiffs' action is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed one-half against plaintiffs and one-half against Beaver.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COMEAUX v. WEILL CONST. CO
(Feb 4, 1987)