AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MARIE BOLGER, Appellant, v. DANIEL L. DAVIS, Defendant, and MERCHANTS AND BUSINESSMEN'S MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed with costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff Bolger sued defendant insurer seeking to recover for real and personal property loss resulting from a fire in January 1980. The court found that she had an insurable life interest in the real property, and that her damages should be calculated by multiplying her life use factor by the actual cash value of the real property loss. Judgment was entered on September 9, 1983. Plaintiff's appeal from that judgment was dismissed on June 6, 1985 for failure to perfect her appeal. Plaintiff then moved before the court, pursuant to CPLR 5019, in March 1986 to cure an alleged error in computing the amount of her loss. The denial of that motion is the subject of this appeal.

In her motion plaintiff alleges that the court stated the correct formula, but inserted incorrect numbers for the "actual cash value of the loss". The court used $22,000, the policy limit, instead of $39,000, the average cost of repairs. This determination may not be corrected by a CPLR 5019 motion, which permits correction of clerical mistakes only, not errors in substance (see, Crain v. Crain, 109 A.D.2d 1094; 2 Carmody-Wait 2d, N.Y. Prac §§ 8:121, 8:122). Plaintiff's sole remedy was by way of appeal, which was abandoned.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOLGER v. DAVIS
(Feb 27, 1987)