AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MIDLAND MORTGAGEE CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellant, v. JOSEPH I. KAZARNOVSKY, Respondent, and MORTON L. GINSBERG, Appellant-Respondent.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this court (see, 22 NYCRR 670.20 [d]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the defendant Ginsberg; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs, payable by the defendant Ginsberg.

The defendant Morton L. Ginsberg sought the services of the plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, in order to procure a $6,800,000 mortgage. The broker's commission was to be earned upon the making of a commitment by the lender, payable at closing. The plaintiff procured a commitment for a lesser amount, which Ginsberg accepted, but no closing occurred.

Although Ginsberg was at liberty to reject the commitment offered, the plaintiff earned its commission when Ginsberg accepted the commitment for the lesser amount (see, Weniger v Union Center Plaza Assocs., 387 F. Supp. 849; Gilder v. Davis, 137 N.Y. 504). Even if one views the payment of the commission as conditioned upon closing, the plaintiff is entitled to recover because Ginsberg refused to close after he accepted the commitment (see, Levy v. Lacey, 22 N.Y.2d 271).

We have examined Ginsberg's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MIDLAND MORTGAGEE CORPORATION v. KAZARNOVSKY
(Mar 9, 1987)