Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The affirmation of the plaintiff's attorney, who had no personal knowledge of the facts asserted therein, was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to the plaintiff's claimed easement over the respondents' property (see, e.g., Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557; Pastore v. Zlatniski, 112 A.D.2d 840). Bracken, J.P., Rubin, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.