AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH WIGGINS, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to prove the defendant's guilt of the crimes of which he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v. Musial, 120 A.D.2d 682; People v. Bauer, 113 A.D.2d 543). Specifically, with respect to the assault, there was ample evidence that the defendant acted in concert with his codefendants.

The defendant's contention that the court erred in failing to give the jury a circumstantial evidence instruction is unpreserved, and, in any event, without merit. A circumstantial evidence charge is required only when the People's case rests entirely on circumstantial evidence (People v. Hines, 120 A.D.2d 676), and at bar the People's case included direct evidence of the defendant's guilt.

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Brown, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WIGGINS
(Mar 23, 1987)