Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROSE MARIE SCHWARZ NICHOLS, APPELLANT, v. ELTON H. SCHWARZ, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's holding that a continuing writ of garnishment is not available under section 61.12(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), for collecting a judgment for arrearages of child support, but is limited in application to ensuring the collectibility of future periodic payments of alimony or child support. See, e.g., Goldstein v. Ginsberg, 399 So.2d 415 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (where husband's duty to make periodic payments had ended, continuing writ of garnishment was not available).

AFFIRMED.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NICHOLS v. SCHWARZ
(Mar 25, 1987)