AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ADONIA PIERRE, APPELLANT, v. ORIENTE SUGAR CANE PLANTING, INC., AND UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Pierre contests an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission determining that he was required to repay $436 to the State of Florida. It appears from the record that appellant did not timely receive the initial notice of this determination pursuant to a misunderstanding as to the requirement that he notify the claims office of his change of address. He was therefore determined to be untimely in his attempt to perfect an appeal of this decision.

We believe under the circumstances of this case that appellant was denied due process of law in being unable to have his appeal determined on the merits, and accordingly we would reverse and remand for further proceedings. Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Florida Department of Commerce, 252 So.2d 396 (Fla.3d DCA 1971); Polatnick v. Florida Department of Commerce, 349 So.2d 203 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and POLEN, MARK E., Associate Judge, concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PIERRE v. ORIENTE SUGAR CANE PLANTING
(Apr 16, 1987)