Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MARTIN, Appellant, v. BLAKNEY et al, Respondents.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Defendants gave plaintiff a notice of deposition. Less than two hours before the time fixed for the deposition, plaintiff's attorney informed defendants' counsel that he was unable to attend. The deposition was reset, but neither plaintiff nor his attorney appeared for that deposition. Defendants' counsel moved for sanctions under ORCP 46. When the motion was called for hearing by the presiding judge, neither plaintiff nor his counsel was present. The court dismissed plaintiff's complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and are persuaded that the court did not abuse its discretion.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARTIN v. BLAKNEY
(Apr 22, 1987)