PER CURIAM.
We affirm the summary judgment under review upon the authority of Shaw v. General Motors Corp., 503 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). As we did in Shaw, we certify the following questions of great public importance to the Supreme Court of Florida:
I. WHETHER THE LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 95.031(2), FLORIDA STATUTES (1983), ABOLISHING THE STATUTE OF REPOSE IN PRODUCT LIABILITY ACTIONS, SHOULD BE CONSTRUED TO OPERATE RETROSPECTIVELY AS TO A CAUSE OF ACTION WHICH ACCRUED BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDMENT.
II. IF NOT, WHETHER THE DECISION OF
PULLUM V. CINCINNATI, INC., 476 So.2d 657 (FLA. 1985),
APPEAL DISMISSED,
___ U.S. ___, 106 S.CT. 1626, 90 L.ED.2D 174 (1986), WHICH OVERRULED
BATTILLA V. ALLIS CHALMERS MFG. CO., 392 So.2d 874 (FLA. 1980), APPLIES SO AS TO BAR A CAUSE OF ACTION THAT ACCRUED AFTER THE
BATTILLA DECISION BUT BEFORE THE
PULLUM DECISION.
Affirmed.