AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN M. BELSITO, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty with knowledge that he might be denied youthful offender status. At sentencing, the defendant did not object to the sentence or seek to withdraw his plea, thereby waiving his right to contest this issue on appeal (see, People v. Polansky, 125 A.D.2d 505; People v. Ifill, 108 A.D.2d 202). Moreover, "eligibility alone does not mandate youthful offender treatment. The granting of such benefit lies wholly within the discretion of the court" (see, People v. Williams, 78 A.D.2d 642; People v. Jordan, 115 A.D.2d 622). Upon a review of the record on appeal, there is no basis for finding that the court abused its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BELSITO
(May 11, 1987)