Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
From the testimony of the complaining witness, the jury could find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant actively participated in the robbery and was not merely present at the scene (see, Penal Law § 20.00; Matter of John G., 118 A.D.2d 646).
We have examined the defendant's contention raised in his pro se brief regarding the court's response to the jury's inquiries during deliberations and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.