LINEBAUGH BY AND THROUGH LINEBAUGH v. HYNDMAN, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

John L. Slimm argued the cause for appellants ( Slimm, Dash Goldberg, attorneys
Marc B. Zingarini, of counsel
Lauren H. Kane, on the brief). Michael L. Testa argued the cause for respondents ( Basile, Testa Testa, attorneys
Richard M. Pescatore, on the brief).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

John L. Slimm argued the cause for appellants ( Slimm, Dash Goldberg, attorneys
Marc B. Zingarini, of counsel
Lauren H. Kane, on the brief). Michael L. Testa argued the cause for respondents ( Basile, Testa Testa, attorneys
Richard M. Pescatore, on the brief).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

SAMANTHA LINEBAUGH, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND NATURAL MOTHER,ANNA LINEBAUGH, AND ANNA LINEBAUGH, IN HER OWN RIGHT,PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HAYWORTH HYNDMAN AND SHERRY THOMPSON, DEFENDANTS,AND ADAM HONEGSTEIN AND MARYLA HONEGSTEIN, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND IN THEALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 213 N.J. Super. 117 (1986).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.