Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

ERICKSON AIR-CRANE COMPANY, Petitioner on Re v. ew,

PER CURIAM

Petition for reconsideration granted. The disposition of our former opinion is amended to read:

"The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings."

PER CURIAM

Respondent on review United Technologies Corporation petitions only for reconsideration of our disposition in this case, Erickson Air-Crane Co. v. United Tech. Corp., 303 Or. 281, 735 P.2d 614 (1987), arguing that, rather than reversing the Court of Appeals and affirming the trial court outright, our disposition should have been a remand to the Court of Appeals for consideration of five assignments of error argued in that court by United Technologies but not considered. This argument is correct. See, e.g., Oregonian Publishing Co. v. O'Leary, 303 Or. 297, 736 P.2d 173 (1987).

Petition for reconsideration granted. The disposition of our former opinion is amended to read:

"The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings."

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ERICKSON AIR-CRANE CO. v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP
(May 27, 1987)