Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF: WILLIAM VANCE STALLINGS, JUVENILE

PER CURIAM.

On 6 January 1987, this Court allowed the petition of the juvenile, William Vance Stallings, for the rehearing of this case. On 23 April 1987, the State filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that rehearing had been improvidently allowed. Having thoroughly reviewed the very helpful new briefs filed on behalf of the juvenile and the State, we conclude that we neither overlooked nor misapprehended any material points of fact or law when we first considered this case. Therefore the State's motion to dismiss the rehearing in this case as improvidently granted is well founded. See Montgomery v. Blades, 223 N.C. 331, 26 S.E.2d 876 (1943); Weisel v. Cobb, 122 N.C. 68 [ 122 N.C. 67], 30 S.E. 312 (1898); Devereux v. Devereux, 81 N.C. 12 (1879).

Rehearing dismissed as improvidently allowed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE STALLINGS
(Jun 1, 1987)