AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ETHAN ALLEN SMITH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE BOROUGH OF BARNEGAT LIGHT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before us by way of appellants' motion for a stay pending appeal. By separate order we have denied that motion. We have accelerated the appeal for purposes of argument and disposition because it involves an election matter. See R. 1:2-5(1).

On our own motion we summarily affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Serpentelli in his written opinion of June 4, 1987, reported at 219 N.J. Super. 231 (Law Div. 1987). See R. 2:8-3(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. BOROUGH OF BARNEGAT LIGHT
(Jun 10, 1987)