PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Shaw v. General Motors Corp., 503 So.2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We certify the same questions:
(1) Whether the legislative amendment of section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1983), abolishing the statute of repose in product liability actions, should be construed to operate retrospectively as to a cause of action which accrued before the effective date of the amendment.
(2) If not, whether the decision of
Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla. 1985),
appeal dismissed,
___ U.S. ___,
106 S.Ct. 1626,
90 L.Ed.2d 174 (1986), which overruled
Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. Co., 392 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1980), applies so as to bar a cause of action that accrued after the
Battilla decision but before the
Pullum decision.
We need not reach the remaining issues.