Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number Civ. A. No. C 82-0360-L(A). Attorney(S) David A. Friedman, General Counsel, Bonnie M. Brown, Rebecca Westerfield, Cooperating Attorneys, American Civil Liberties Union of Ky., Louisville, Kentucky, Nan D. Hunter, Lynn M. Paltrow, Janet Benshoof, Rachael Pine, ACLU Foundation, New York City, for plaintiffs. For L.J. Hollenbach, III, Wm. C. Grimes, Louisville, Kent., for defendants. Ryan M. Halloran, Stanley A. Stratford, Asst., Wm. K. Moore, Charlotte L. Levy, W. Kimble Moore, Jr., Frankfort, Nor Wake, Florence Huffman, David G. Vest, Asst. Co.Atty., Ray Larson, Lexington, Kent., David L. Armstrong, Attorney General, Mary James Young, Asst. Atty.Gen., Frankfort, Kent., Michael E. Conliffe, N. Scott Lilly, First Asst. Co. Atty., Louisville, Kent., J. Michael Noyes, Office of Governor, Frankfort, Kent., for Collins and Austin. David R. Melton, John K. Webb, The Rutherford Institute of Ky, Paris, Kent., for intervening defendants. Theodore Amshoff Louisville, Kent., Amicus. Judges Charles Mengel Allen See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. Samuel G. EUBANKS, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Martha Layne COLLINS, et al., Defendants. ORDER ALLEN, Senior District Judge Plaintiffs having moved this Court for a stay of this case pending the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Hartigan v. Zbaraz, No. 85-673, and to extend Plaintiffs' time to file their summary judgment motion until after the Supreme Court renders its decision in Hartigan, and inasmuch as it appears that the issues in Hartigan are relevant to the issues to be decided in the case sub judice, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion be, and it hereby is, granted. Plaintiffs' motion for extension of time until June 30, 1987, to file a motion for summary judgment is hereby moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' time to file a motion for summary judgment be, and it hereby is, extended until thirty (30) days after the date the United States Supreme Court renders a decision in Hartigan v. Zbaraz, No. 85-673.