Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record supports the hearing court's determination that the photographic array utilized by the police was not composed or presented in a suggestive manner (People v Burwell, 26 N.Y.2d 331; People v Edwards, 115 A.D.2d 657; People v Logan, 25 N.Y.2d 184, cert denied 396 U.S. 1020; People v Rodriguez, 64 N.Y.2d 738; People v Andersen, 118 A.D.2d 716). The record also supports the alternate determination by the hearing court that the witnesses' recollection of the persons who committed the robbery had a source independent of any photographic procedure (see, People v Adams, 53 N.Y.2d 241; People v Papile, 113 A.D.2d 776, lv denied 66 N.Y.2d 921). Mangano, J.P., Spatt, Niehoff and Harwood, JJ., concur.