Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PETER A. MEREDITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand with instructions to allow Peter A. Meredith to withdraw his plea to first degree murder and to proceed to trial.

We do this because the trial court should not have accepted the defendant's plea without first determining whether there was a factual basis for the plea. See Rule 3.172(a), Fla.R.Crim.P.; Maselli v. State, 446 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1984); and Dydek v. State, 400 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Such determination was not adequately made and this resulted in manifest injustice to the defendant. The material in the file upon which the trial court relied reflects a lack of the essential element of premeditation and, hence, there is no factual basis for the charge of first degree murder.

Reversed and Remanded.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEREDITH v. STATE
(Jul 1, 1987)