Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with one bill of costs payable to the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the application is denied.
The claimant, who offered virtually no excuse for the delay in filing notices of claim, asserts only the existence of a "distinct possibility" that one or more of the appellants acquired actual knowledge of the accident within 90 days of its occurrence, which knowledge each of the appellants denies. Moreover, because the accident occurred at an active construction site, reconstruction of the circumstances existing at the time of the accident is all but impossible (see, Kravitz v County of Rockland, 112 A.D.2d 352, affd 67 N.Y.2d 685). Under the totality of the circumstances, the court of first instance abused its discretion in granting the application. Eiber, J.P., Kunzeman, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.