AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIE JOE HOLLAWAY, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals his conviction of first degree sexual abuse and first degree sodomy of a nine-year-old child on or about April 20, 1983. He claims that the court erred in allowing the child to testify that on April 25, 1983 she told a nurse at Highland Hospital that defendant had "messed with her". We agree. This prior consistent statement was made approximately five days after the alleged sexual crime and, therefore, it is not admissible as evidence of a timely complaint (cf., People v. Scott, 124 A.D.2d 974, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 717; People v. Vicaretti, 54 A.D.2d 236, 244). Nevertheless, this error was harmless. The People's proof was overwhelming and we find no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted defendant had this evidence not been admitted (People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 242).

Defendant further contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for an adverse inference jury instruction for the People's failure to call Police Sergeant Wale and the victim's father. Because the testimony of these witnesses would have been either cumulative or immaterial to the crime charged, the trial court correctly denied defendant's request (cf., People v. Jackson, 122 A.D.2d 566, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 915).

We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HOLLAWAY
(Jul 10, 1987)