Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court, Nassau County, did not abuse its discretion by denying the plaintiff husband's motion. The plaintiff's contentions concerning his reasons for bringing this action, inter alia, to obtain a change of custody of the parties' son, do not include factual allegations which would warrant the ordering of psychiatric and forensic evaluations of the parties at this juncture in the proceedings. Niehoff, J.P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.