Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

BRUCE v. THE STATE.

DEEN, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Harry Wayne Bruce, was convicted of commercial gambling. The sole issue in his appeal is whether a City of Atlanta police officer, who is also a deputy sheriff of Fulton County, has the authority to apply for, obtain and execute a search warrant in Clayton County. OCGA §§ 17-5-20 and 17-5-21 provide that any officer of this state or its political subdivisions charged with the duty of enforcing the criminal laws may apply for a search warrant. OCGA § 17-5-24 also provides that "[t]he search warrant ... shall be directed for execution to all peace officers of this state." Accordingly, the City of Atlanta police officer/Fulton County deputy sheriff in this case was authorized to apply for and execute the search warrant in Clayton County. See Fowler v. State, 128 Ga. App. 501 ( 197 S.E.2d 502) (1973).

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong, C. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED JULY 13, 1987.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRUCE v. STATE
(Jul 13, 1987)